Образы «большой науки» и подходы к экополитике в западной социологии риска
Выражение признательности
Статья подготовлена при поддержке Российского гуманитарного научного фонда (грант № 04–03–00–499а).
Для цитирования
Королева Е. В. Образы «большой науки» и подходы к экополитике в западной социологии риска // Социологический журнал. 2005. № 3. С. С. 37-52.
Аннотация
-
Литература
Бек У. Общество риска. На пути к другому модерну. М.: Прогресс-Традиция, 2000.
Вилдавски А., Дейк К. Теория восприятия риска: кто боится, чего и по-чему? // THESIS. 1994. № 5. С. 268–276.
Яницкий О.Н. Социология риска. М.: Институт социологии РАН, 2003.
Adam B., Loon J. Introduction: Repositioning risk; the challenge for social theory // The risk society and beyond. London: Sage Publications, 2000. P. 1-31.
Ali S. The search for a landfill site in the risk society // The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology. 1999. February.
Beamish T.B. Environmental hazard and institutional betrayal // Organization & Environment. 2001. March.
Beck U. Politics of risk society // The politics of risk society / Ed. by J. Franklin. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998.
Beck U. The reinvention of politics: Toward a theory of reflexive mod-ernization // Beck U., Giddens A., Lash S. Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetic in the modern social order. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994. P. 1-55.
Bradburry J. The policy implications of differing concepts of risk // Science, Technology and Human Values. 1989. Vol. 14. No. 4. P. 380-399.
Covello V., Sadman P., Slovic P. Risk communication, risk statistics, and risk comparisons: A manual for plant managers. Washington: Chemical Manufacturers Association, 1988.
Dake K. Myths of nature: Culture and social construction of risk // Journal of Social Issues. 1992. Vol. 48. No. 4. P. 21-37.
Douglas M., Wildavsky A. Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982.
Fischhoff B., Lichetnstein S., Slovic P. Acceptable risk. New York: Cam-bridge University Press, 1981.
Fischhoff B., Slovic P., Lichetnstein S. The public vs. “the experts” // The analysis actual vs. perceived risks / Ed. by V. Covello, W. Flamm, J. Rodricks. New York: Plenum, 1983.
Foster J.B. Marx’s theory of metabolic rift: Classical foundations for envi-ronmental sociology // American Journal of Sociology. 1999. Vol. 105. Is-sue 2. Р. 366-405.
Irwin A. Science and its publics: Continuity and change in the risk society // Social Studies of Science. 1994. Vol. 24. Р. 168-184.
Johnson B. Advancing understanding of knowledge's role in lay risk percep-tion // Sociological Abstracts Delivery. SA accession number 92S26088. [online] Date of access: 17.07.2002
Layton A., Jenkins E., Macgill S., Davey A. Inarticulate Science? Perspectives on the public understanding of science and some implications for science ed-ucation. Driffield: Studies in Education Ltd, 1993.
Lupton D. Risk. London: Routledge, 1999.
Murphy R. Sociology and nature. Colorado: Westview Press, 1997.
Plough A., Krimsky S. The emergence of risk communication studies: Social and political context // Science, Technology and Human Values. 1987. No. 12. P. 4-10.
Rinkevicius L. Public risk perceptions in a “double-risk” society: The case of the Ignalina nuclear power plant in Lithuania. Innovation // Abingdon. 2000. September.
Rogers E., Kincaid D. Communication networks: Toward the new paradigm for research. New York: Free Press, 1981.
Slovic P., Fischhoff B., Lichetnstein S. Facts and fears: Understanding per-ceived risk // Societal risk assessment: How safe is safe enough? / Ed. by R. Schwing, B. Albers New York: Plenum, 1980. P. 181-213.
Slovic P., Fischhoff B., Lichetnstein S. Perceived risk: Psychological factors and social implications // The assessment and perceptions of risk / Ed. by F. Warner, D. Slater. London: Royal Society, 1981.
Slovic P., Fischhoff B., Lichetnstein S. Rating the risk // Environment. 1979. No. 21(3). P. 14-39.
Wynne B. Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identities and the public uptake of science // Public Understanding of Science. 1992. Vol. 1(3). P. 281-304.
Wynne B. Technology, risk and participation // Society, technology and risk assessment / Ed. by J. Conrad. New York: Academic Press, 1980. P. 173-208.
Вилдавски А., Дейк К. Теория восприятия риска: кто боится, чего и по-чему? // THESIS. 1994. № 5. С. 268–276.
Яницкий О.Н. Социология риска. М.: Институт социологии РАН, 2003.
Adam B., Loon J. Introduction: Repositioning risk; the challenge for social theory // The risk society and beyond. London: Sage Publications, 2000. P. 1-31.
Ali S. The search for a landfill site in the risk society // The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology. 1999. February.
Beamish T.B. Environmental hazard and institutional betrayal // Organization & Environment. 2001. March.
Beck U. Politics of risk society // The politics of risk society / Ed. by J. Franklin. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998.
Beck U. The reinvention of politics: Toward a theory of reflexive mod-ernization // Beck U., Giddens A., Lash S. Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetic in the modern social order. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1994. P. 1-55.
Bradburry J. The policy implications of differing concepts of risk // Science, Technology and Human Values. 1989. Vol. 14. No. 4. P. 380-399.
Covello V., Sadman P., Slovic P. Risk communication, risk statistics, and risk comparisons: A manual for plant managers. Washington: Chemical Manufacturers Association, 1988.
Dake K. Myths of nature: Culture and social construction of risk // Journal of Social Issues. 1992. Vol. 48. No. 4. P. 21-37.
Douglas M., Wildavsky A. Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982.
Fischhoff B., Lichetnstein S., Slovic P. Acceptable risk. New York: Cam-bridge University Press, 1981.
Fischhoff B., Slovic P., Lichetnstein S. The public vs. “the experts” // The analysis actual vs. perceived risks / Ed. by V. Covello, W. Flamm, J. Rodricks. New York: Plenum, 1983.
Foster J.B. Marx’s theory of metabolic rift: Classical foundations for envi-ronmental sociology // American Journal of Sociology. 1999. Vol. 105. Is-sue 2. Р. 366-405.
Irwin A. Science and its publics: Continuity and change in the risk society // Social Studies of Science. 1994. Vol. 24. Р. 168-184.
Johnson B. Advancing understanding of knowledge's role in lay risk percep-tion // Sociological Abstracts Delivery. SA accession number 92S26088. [online]
Layton A., Jenkins E., Macgill S., Davey A. Inarticulate Science? Perspectives on the public understanding of science and some implications for science ed-ucation. Driffield: Studies in Education Ltd, 1993.
Lupton D. Risk. London: Routledge, 1999.
Murphy R. Sociology and nature. Colorado: Westview Press, 1997.
Plough A., Krimsky S. The emergence of risk communication studies: Social and political context // Science, Technology and Human Values. 1987. No. 12. P. 4-10.
Rinkevicius L. Public risk perceptions in a “double-risk” society: The case of the Ignalina nuclear power plant in Lithuania. Innovation // Abingdon. 2000. September.
Rogers E., Kincaid D. Communication networks: Toward the new paradigm for research. New York: Free Press, 1981.
Slovic P., Fischhoff B., Lichetnstein S. Facts and fears: Understanding per-ceived risk // Societal risk assessment: How safe is safe enough? / Ed. by R. Schwing, B. Albers New York: Plenum, 1980. P. 181-213.
Slovic P., Fischhoff B., Lichetnstein S. Perceived risk: Psychological factors and social implications // The assessment and perceptions of risk / Ed. by F. Warner, D. Slater. London: Royal Society, 1981.
Slovic P., Fischhoff B., Lichetnstein S. Rating the risk // Environment. 1979. No. 21(3). P. 14-39.
Wynne B. Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identities and the public uptake of science // Public Understanding of Science. 1992. Vol. 1(3). P. 281-304.
Wynne B. Technology, risk and participation // Society, technology and risk assessment / Ed. by J. Conrad. New York: Academic Press, 1980. P. 173-208.
Форматы цитирования
Другие форматы цитирования:
ACM
[1]
Королева, Е.В. 2005. Образы «большой науки» и подходы к экополитике в западной социологии риска. Социологический журнал. 3 (мар. 2005), С. 37-52.
Раздел
ТЕОРИЯ И МЕТОДОЛОГИЯ
Все права на статью принадлежат авторам. Авторы передают права на использование статьи, в том числе на использование статьи в открытом доступе, издателю журнала на условиях неисключительной лицензии (Авторское соглашение (публичная оферта))
Принятием условий этого договора автором считается передача им материалов в редакцию через официальный сайт журнала ("Отправить рукопись") или через электронную почту редакции.
