Анализ развития тематики в базах ScienceDirect и Scopus
Для цитирования
Колозариди П. В., Ульданов А. А. Анализ развития тематики в базах ScienceDirect и Scopus // Социологический журнал. 2015. Том 21. № 3. С. С. 105-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2015.21.3.2380
Аннотация
На сегодняшний день исследования роли Интернета в качестве среды и ресурса для гражданской и общественной активности представляют собой одно из основных направлений в теории общественных движений. Однако поле исследований неоднородно, теоретическая их значимость не всегда очевидна, и кроме того, не всегда можно определить тождество терминов или сходство методологических оснований.В настоящей статье предпринимается попытка анализа того, как развивается тематическое поле исследований Интернета и общественных движений (ИСД) в последние 20 лет. Эмпирическая база исследования — источники по данной тематике, опубликованные в международных реферируемых журналах, включенных в базы ScienceDirect и Scopus.Собранная информация была каталогизирована в отдельную базу данных. Для ее исследования применены методы контент-анализа, а также сравнительный анализ публикаций по нескольким параметрам, позволившие выявить динамику публикационной активности по проблемам ИСД и систематизировать тематические направления, существовавшие в разные годы. Показано, как складывалось направление ИСД и основные этапы его формирования; как происходило изменение тем, дисциплинарных и методологических подходов; в каком контексте существует и развивается традиция исследований интернета и социальных движений.
Ключевые слова:
история науки, научные базы данных, интернет, исследования интернета, общественные движения
Литература
Dery M. Escape Velocity: Cyberculture at the End of the Century. [Russ. ed: Deri M. Skorost' ubeganiya: Kiberkul'tura na rubezhe vekov. Transl. T. Parfenovoi. Ekaterinburg: Ul'tra.Kul'tura; Moscow: ACT Publ., 2008. 480 p.]
Castells M. The Rise of the Network Society, The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. [Russ. ed.: Kastel's M. Informatsionnaya epokha: ekonomika obshchestvo i kul'tura. Transl. O.I. Shkaratana. Moscow: SU HSE, 2000. 608 p.]
Castells M. The Internet Galaxy, Reflections on the Internet, Business and Society. [Russ. ed.: Kastel's M. Galaktika internet. Razmyshleniya ob internete, biznese i obshchestve. [Transl. by A. Matveeva; ed. V. Kharitonova. Moscow: U-Faktoriya Publ., 2004. 328 p.]
Klimov I.A. Dvizheniya sotsial'nye. Bol'shaya rossiiskaya entsiklopediya: 30 vol. Ed. Yu.S. Osipov. Vol. 8: Grigor'ev –Dinamika. Moscow: BRE Publ., 2007. P. 581–589.
Smith P. Narrating the guillotine: Punishment technology and symbol. Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie. 2008. Vol. 7. No. 2. P. 3–23. (In Russ.)
Acemoglu D., Hassan T., Tahoun A. The Power of the Street: Evidence from Egypt's Arab Spring. Working paper. L.: CEPR Publishing, 2014. 76 p.
Andrews K.T., Caren N. Making the News: Movement Organizations, Media Attention, and the Public Agenda. American Sociological Review. 2010 Vol. 75. No. 6. P. 841–866.
Castells M. The Rise of the Network Society, The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA; Oxford, UK: Blackwell. 2000. 594 p.
Clemens E.S. Toward a Historicized Sociology: Theorizing Events, Processes, and Emergence. Annual Review of Sociology. 2007. Vol. 33. P. 527–549.
Cohen S. The Ordinary Ethics of Online Petitioning: Justice and the Promise of Writing on Runet. Perspectives on Europe. 2014. Vol. 44. No. 1. P. 48–55.
Della Porta D., Diani M. Social Movements: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2006. 356 p.
DiGrazia J., et al. More tweets, more votes: Social media as a quantitative indicator of political behavior. PloS one. 2013. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 1–11.
Dinas E., Vassil K. A look into the mirror: Preferences, representation and electoral participation. Electoral Studies. 2014. Vol. 36. P. 290–297.
Dooley K. Media and Social Movements. Social and Behavioral Studies. 2001. Vol. 33. No. 5. P. 47–62.
Earl J., Kimport K. Digitally enabled social change: Activism in the internet age. Cambridge: Mit Press, 2011. 272 p.
Fligstein N., McAdam D. Toward a General Theory of Strategic Action Fields. Sociological Theory. 2011. Vol. 29. No. 1. P. 1–26.
Gamson W.A. Bystanders, Public Opinion, and the Media. The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Eds. D.A. Snow, S.A. Soule, H. Kriesi. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers, 2004. P. 339–359.
Gould R.V. Multiple Networks and Mobilization in the Paris Commune, 1871. American Sociological Review. 1991. Vol. 56. No. 6. P. 716–729.
Hardarsson O., Kristinnson G. Iceland. European Journal of Political Research Data Yearbook. 2012. Vol. 51. No. 1. P. 136–140.
Howard P.N., Duffy A., Freelon D., Hussain M., Mari W., Mazaid M. Opening closed regimes: What was the role of social media during the Arab Spring? Working Paper. Seattle: Project on Information Technology and Political Islam, 2011. 30 p.
Hedström P., Sandell R., Stern S. Mesolevel Networks and the Diffusion of Social Movements: The Case of the Swedish Social Democratic Party. American Journal of Sociology. 2000. Vol. 106. No. 1. P. 145–72.
Hill K. A., Hughes J. E. Cyberpolitics: Citizen activism in the age of the Internet. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc., 1998. 224 p.
Jansen S. The streets of Beograd. Urban space and protest identities in Serbia. Political Geography. 2001. Vol. 20. No. 1. P. 35–55.
Levy S. Hackers, Heroes of the computer revolution. New York: Dell Publishing, 1994. 520 p.
Marden P. Geographies of dissent: Globalization, identity and the nation. Political Geography. 1997. Vol. 16. No. 1. P. 37–64.
McCarthy J.D., McPhail C., Smith J. Images of Protest: Dimensions of Selection Bias in Media Coverage of Washington Demonstrations in 1982 and 1991. American Sociological Review. 1996. Vol. 61. P. 478–99.
Meyer D S., Staggenborg S. Movements, Countermovements and the Structure of Political Opportunity. American Journal of Sociology. 1996. Vol. 101. P. 1628–1660.
Mungiu-Pippidi A., Munteanu I. Moldova's “Twitter Revolution”. Journal of Democracy. 2009. Vol. 20. No. 3. P. 136–142.
Oliver P.E., Myers D.J. The Coevolution of Social Movements. Mobilization. An International Journal. 2002. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 1–24.
Polletta F. It Was Like a Fever...: Narrative and Identity in Social Protest. Social Problems. 1998. Vol. 45. P. 137–159.
Rascot A. (In)Forming politics: Processes of feminist activism in the information age. Women's Studies International Forum. 2001. Vol. 24. No. 3–4. P. 409–421.
Roman D. Gendering Eastern Europe: Pre-feminism, prejudice, and east-west dialogues in post-communist Romania. Women Studies. 2001. Vol. 24. No. 1. P. 53–66.
Roscigno V.J. Danaher. F.W. Media and Mobilization: The Case of Radio and Southern Textile Worker Insurgency, 1929–1934. American Sociological Review. 2001. Vol. 66. No. 2. P. 21–48.
Scammell M. The internet and civic engagement: The age of the citizen-consumer. Political Communication. 2000. Vol. 17. No. 4. P. 351–355.
Scott A. Forming politics: Processes of feminist activism in the information age. Women studies. 2001. Vol. 24. No. 3. P. 409–421.
Slaughter R. The knowledge base of futures studies as an evolving process. Futures. 1996. Vol. 28. No. 9. P. 799–812.
Snow D.A. Collective Identity and Expressive Forms. International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences. L.: Elseveir Science, 2001. P. 2212–2219.
Snow D.A. Framing Processes, Ideology, and Discursive Fields. The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Eds. D.A. Snow, S.A. Soule, H. Kriesi. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers, 2004. P. 380–412
Snow D.A., Soule A.S., Kriesi H. Mapping the Terrain. The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Eds. D.A. Snow, S.A. Soule, H. Kriesi. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers, 2004. P. 3–16
Snow D.A., Zurcher-Jr. L.A., Ekland-Olson S. Social Networks and Social Movements: A Microstructural Approach to Differential Recruitment. American Sociological Review. 1980. Vol. 45. No. 5. P. 787–801.
Tilly C. Social Movements, 1768–2004. Boulder and L.: Paradigm Publishers. 2004. 262 p.
Tehranian M., Ogden M. Uncertain futures: Changing paradigms and global communications. Futures 1998. Vol. 30. No. 2. P. 199–210.
Turner F. From counterculture to cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the rise of digital utopianism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010. 354 p.
Vakil A. Confronting the classification problem: Toward a taxonomy of NGOs. World Development. 1997. Vol. 25. No. 12. P. 2057–2070.
Waitzkin H., Iriart C., Estrada A., Lamadrid S. Social medicine in Latin America: Productivity and dangers facing the major national groups. The Lancet. 2001. Vol. 358. No. 9278. P. 315–323.
Whittier N.E. Political Generations, Micro-Cohorts, and the Transformation of Social Movements. American Sociological Review. 1997. Vol. 62. P. 760–778.
Castells M. The Rise of the Network Society, The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. [Russ. ed.: Kastel's M. Informatsionnaya epokha: ekonomika obshchestvo i kul'tura. Transl. O.I. Shkaratana. Moscow: SU HSE, 2000. 608 p.]
Castells M. The Internet Galaxy, Reflections on the Internet, Business and Society. [Russ. ed.: Kastel's M. Galaktika internet. Razmyshleniya ob internete, biznese i obshchestve. [Transl. by A. Matveeva; ed. V. Kharitonova. Moscow: U-Faktoriya Publ., 2004. 328 p.]
Klimov I.A. Dvizheniya sotsial'nye. Bol'shaya rossiiskaya entsiklopediya: 30 vol. Ed. Yu.S. Osipov. Vol. 8: Grigor'ev –Dinamika. Moscow: BRE Publ., 2007. P. 581–589.
Smith P. Narrating the guillotine: Punishment technology and symbol. Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie. 2008. Vol. 7. No. 2. P. 3–23. (In Russ.)
Acemoglu D., Hassan T., Tahoun A. The Power of the Street: Evidence from Egypt's Arab Spring. Working paper. L.: CEPR Publishing, 2014. 76 p.
Andrews K.T., Caren N. Making the News: Movement Organizations, Media Attention, and the Public Agenda. American Sociological Review. 2010 Vol. 75. No. 6. P. 841–866.
Castells M. The Rise of the Network Society, The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA; Oxford, UK: Blackwell. 2000. 594 p.
Clemens E.S. Toward a Historicized Sociology: Theorizing Events, Processes, and Emergence. Annual Review of Sociology. 2007. Vol. 33. P. 527–549.
Cohen S. The Ordinary Ethics of Online Petitioning: Justice and the Promise of Writing on Runet. Perspectives on Europe. 2014. Vol. 44. No. 1. P. 48–55.
Della Porta D., Diani M. Social Movements: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2006. 356 p.
DiGrazia J., et al. More tweets, more votes: Social media as a quantitative indicator of political behavior. PloS one. 2013. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 1–11.
Dinas E., Vassil K. A look into the mirror: Preferences, representation and electoral participation. Electoral Studies. 2014. Vol. 36. P. 290–297.
Dooley K. Media and Social Movements. Social and Behavioral Studies. 2001. Vol. 33. No. 5. P. 47–62.
Earl J., Kimport K. Digitally enabled social change: Activism in the internet age. Cambridge: Mit Press, 2011. 272 p.
Fligstein N., McAdam D. Toward a General Theory of Strategic Action Fields. Sociological Theory. 2011. Vol. 29. No. 1. P. 1–26.
Gamson W.A. Bystanders, Public Opinion, and the Media. The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Eds. D.A. Snow, S.A. Soule, H. Kriesi. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers, 2004. P. 339–359.
Gould R.V. Multiple Networks and Mobilization in the Paris Commune, 1871. American Sociological Review. 1991. Vol. 56. No. 6. P. 716–729.
Hardarsson O., Kristinnson G. Iceland. European Journal of Political Research Data Yearbook. 2012. Vol. 51. No. 1. P. 136–140.
Howard P.N., Duffy A., Freelon D., Hussain M., Mari W., Mazaid M. Opening closed regimes: What was the role of social media during the Arab Spring? Working Paper. Seattle: Project on Information Technology and Political Islam, 2011. 30 p.
Hedström P., Sandell R., Stern S. Mesolevel Networks and the Diffusion of Social Movements: The Case of the Swedish Social Democratic Party. American Journal of Sociology. 2000. Vol. 106. No. 1. P. 145–72.
Hill K. A., Hughes J. E. Cyberpolitics: Citizen activism in the age of the Internet. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc., 1998. 224 p.
Jansen S. The streets of Beograd. Urban space and protest identities in Serbia. Political Geography. 2001. Vol. 20. No. 1. P. 35–55.
Levy S. Hackers, Heroes of the computer revolution. New York: Dell Publishing, 1994. 520 p.
Marden P. Geographies of dissent: Globalization, identity and the nation. Political Geography. 1997. Vol. 16. No. 1. P. 37–64.
McCarthy J.D., McPhail C., Smith J. Images of Protest: Dimensions of Selection Bias in Media Coverage of Washington Demonstrations in 1982 and 1991. American Sociological Review. 1996. Vol. 61. P. 478–99.
Meyer D S., Staggenborg S. Movements, Countermovements and the Structure of Political Opportunity. American Journal of Sociology. 1996. Vol. 101. P. 1628–1660.
Mungiu-Pippidi A., Munteanu I. Moldova's “Twitter Revolution”. Journal of Democracy. 2009. Vol. 20. No. 3. P. 136–142.
Oliver P.E., Myers D.J. The Coevolution of Social Movements. Mobilization. An International Journal. 2002. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 1–24.
Polletta F. It Was Like a Fever...: Narrative and Identity in Social Protest. Social Problems. 1998. Vol. 45. P. 137–159.
Rascot A. (In)Forming politics: Processes of feminist activism in the information age. Women's Studies International Forum. 2001. Vol. 24. No. 3–4. P. 409–421.
Roman D. Gendering Eastern Europe: Pre-feminism, prejudice, and east-west dialogues in post-communist Romania. Women Studies. 2001. Vol. 24. No. 1. P. 53–66.
Roscigno V.J. Danaher. F.W. Media and Mobilization: The Case of Radio and Southern Textile Worker Insurgency, 1929–1934. American Sociological Review. 2001. Vol. 66. No. 2. P. 21–48.
Scammell M. The internet and civic engagement: The age of the citizen-consumer. Political Communication. 2000. Vol. 17. No. 4. P. 351–355.
Scott A. Forming politics: Processes of feminist activism in the information age. Women studies. 2001. Vol. 24. No. 3. P. 409–421.
Slaughter R. The knowledge base of futures studies as an evolving process. Futures. 1996. Vol. 28. No. 9. P. 799–812.
Snow D.A. Collective Identity and Expressive Forms. International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences. L.: Elseveir Science, 2001. P. 2212–2219.
Snow D.A. Framing Processes, Ideology, and Discursive Fields. The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Eds. D.A. Snow, S.A. Soule, H. Kriesi. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers, 2004. P. 380–412
Snow D.A., Soule A.S., Kriesi H. Mapping the Terrain. The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Eds. D.A. Snow, S.A. Soule, H. Kriesi. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers, 2004. P. 3–16
Snow D.A., Zurcher-Jr. L.A., Ekland-Olson S. Social Networks and Social Movements: A Microstructural Approach to Differential Recruitment. American Sociological Review. 1980. Vol. 45. No. 5. P. 787–801.
Tilly C. Social Movements, 1768–2004. Boulder and L.: Paradigm Publishers. 2004. 262 p.
Tehranian M., Ogden M. Uncertain futures: Changing paradigms and global communications. Futures 1998. Vol. 30. No. 2. P. 199–210.
Turner F. From counterculture to cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the rise of digital utopianism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010. 354 p.
Vakil A. Confronting the classification problem: Toward a taxonomy of NGOs. World Development. 1997. Vol. 25. No. 12. P. 2057–2070.
Waitzkin H., Iriart C., Estrada A., Lamadrid S. Social medicine in Latin America: Productivity and dangers facing the major national groups. The Lancet. 2001. Vol. 358. No. 9278. P. 315–323.
Whittier N.E. Political Generations, Micro-Cohorts, and the Transformation of Social Movements. American Sociological Review. 1997. Vol. 62. P. 760–778.
Форматы цитирования
Другие форматы цитирования:
ACM
[1]
Колозариди, П.В. и Ульданов, А.А. 2015. Анализ развития тематики в базах ScienceDirect и Scopus. Социологический журнал. 21, 3 (сен. 2015), С. 105-128. DOI:https://doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2015.21.3.2380.
Раздел
СОЦИОЛОГИЯ ИНТЕРНЕТ
Все права на статью принадлежат авторам. Авторы передают права на использование статьи, в том числе на использование статьи в открытом доступе, издателю журнала на условиях неисключительной лицензии (Авторское соглашение (публичная оферта))
Принятием условий этого договора автором считается передача им материалов в редакцию через официальный сайт журнала ("Отправить рукопись") или через электронную почту редакции.
